Haruna Arakawa vs Monique Barry Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 30 Jul at 04:54 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
H. Arakawa vs M. Barry

JPN
1
Win
Played
1
Win

NZL
1
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Arakawa 1 - 1 Barry
They have played 4 sets in total, with Haruna Arakawa winning 2 and Monique Barry winning 2. The last match between Monique Barry and Haruna Arakawa was at the W35 Nakhon Pathom, 30-07-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Monique Barry getting the victory 7-6(5) 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Arakawa | 1 |
| Barry | 1 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(R1) W35 Nakhon Pathom(07-30-25)
(R1) W75 Sydney(10-30-24)
H. Arakawa vs M. Barry H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $2,200 |
| 52.20% (249-228) | Career Total W/L | 49.77% (109-110) |
| 1 | Hard | 1 |
| 4 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 100.00% (2-0) |
H. Arakawa vs M. Barry Match Preview:
- Barry's recent second serve win rate stands at 38.45%, barely edging Arakawa's 38.24%. Does this mean the serve won't be a critical differentiator? Slightly, but Barry has the edge here.
- Advantage Arakawa in return games: they win 52.04% of their opponent's second serve points compared to Barry's 48.23%.
- On first serve returns, Arakawa again leads with 38.3% success against Barry's 35.25%, providing a slight competitive edge.
- Under pressure, Barry's saved 46.15% of breakpoints while Arakawa saved 45.32%, a marginal difference favoring Barry.
- Both players have won 50.82% of their matches in the last year, making overall performance equal in terms of win-loss percentage.
- Surface strength varies: Barry excels on grass at 59%, but Arakawa thrives on indoor hard courts with a 60% win rate, suggesting surface choice could matter.
- Despite equivalent winning percentages on the Challenger/ITF circuit, Barry's played slightly fewer matches, which may impact stamina and experience.
- In direct encounters, Arakawa leads the head-to-head with a win over Barry, having never lost a set to them.
- Historically, these matches average two hours in duration, indicating closely contested battles.
- Neither player has an edge in deciding sets head-to-head, but Arakawa wins 71% of deciding sets across all matches, compared to Barry's 60%.
- Arakawa has a superior breakpoint conversion rate at 42.92%, compared to Barry's 37.66%, critical during high-pressure points.
Editorial Prediction (July 30, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match sees both Barry and Arakawa entering with equivalent win-loss records, suggesting a tightly contested battle. However, Arakawa’s superior return stats and historical head-to-head advantage could play a pivotal role.
Barry has a slight edge in second serve performance and on grass, but the match will take place on a hard court, favoring Arakawa's best surface.
With Arakawa's stronger track record in return games and pressure-point situations, allied to their previous head-to-head victory, they appear more likely to clinch this encounter.
Given the analyzed statistics and historical matchup outcomes, Arakawa is predicted to win the upcoming match.
Haruna Arakawa vs Monique Barry Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
H. Arakawa vs M. Barry H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 22 | Games Won | 24 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
| 2:6:22 | Average Match Time | 2:6:22 |
| 72% (113/156) | 1st Serve % | 51% (75/147) |
| 50% (57/113) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (47/75) |
| 47% (20/43) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (33/72) |
| 43% (10/23) | Break Pts Won % | 55% (11/20) |
| 46% (67/147) | Return Points Win % | 51% (79/156) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
H. Arakawa Recent Matches Played
M. Barry Recent Matches Played

H. Arakawa vs M. Barry Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 52.20% (249/228) | YTD Win/Loss | 49.77% (109/110) |
| 51.45% (550/519) | Sets Win/Loss | 49.49% (245/250) |
| 50.82% (4861/4704) | Games Win/Loss | 50.88% (2255/2177) |
| 52.68% (177/159) | Hard Win/Loss | 48.78% (80/84) |
| 44.23% (23/29) | Clay Win/Loss | 50.00% (16/16) |
| 56.32% (49/38) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 59.09% (13/9) |
| 0.03 | Aces Per Game | 0.17 |
| 157 | Aces Total | 363 |
| 0.2 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
| 942 | Total Double Faults | 517 |
| 1:33:57 | Average Match Time | 1:15:33 |
| 534.57 | Average Opponent Rank | 431.05 |
| 69% (18688/27133) | 1st Serve % | 61% (6818/11252) |
| 56% (10478/18688) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (4165/6818) |
| 45% (3769/8447) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (2041/4434) |
| 50% (1838/3713) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (693/1473) |
| 48% (13074/27210) | Return Points Win % | 46% (5392/11805) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 75.00% (3/1) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 47.74% (169/185) | Challenger W/L | 49.41% (84/86) |
| 65.57% (80/42) | Futures W/L | 50.00% (21/21) |
| 52% (244/465) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (108/217) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 53% (43/81) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 43% (16/37) |
| 54% (67/123) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (31/59) |
| 85% (248/212) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (108/91) |
| 14% (248/35) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (108/17) |
| 14% (229/33) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (111/18) |